Article.
Vira Slipetska
УДК 81’1+81’373
CURSINGS AS
BEHAVIOUR SPEECH FORMULAS THAT VERBALIZE NEGATIVE EMOTIONS AND STATES
The scientific research is focused on the analysis of
the communicative laws represented by means of cursings in which the speech
formulas and models of communicative tactics have been fixed and realized by
the representatives of a certain linguistic culture in the aspect of
actualization of negative emotions, states, feelings to verbalize threats,
quarrels taking into account a national character of a certain linguistic
culture.
Keywords: linguistic culture, communicative space,
speech formula, cursing, threats, quarrels, negative estimation, national
character.
A modern
interpretative prahmalinguistic paradigm of knowledge is focused on the
analysis of the peculiarities of a communicative space modeling aimed at a
successful communication. The experience of certain linguistic cultures must be
investigated. This experience concerns the communicative tactics that verbalize
different communicative situations illustrating negative emotions, feelings and
states, quarrels, threats, etc. But in every linguistic culture there's the
system, certain speech formulas, stereotype phrases that are used to neutralize
or to explain in an ironic form the reasons for negativeness in communication,
to foresee the possibility of appearing of such communicative situations, to
focus on positiveness. Such a communicative code is reflected in cursings
[Франко 2006]. The above mentioned investigative approach belongs to the
topical directions of linguistics, such as: axiological pragmalinguistics,
linguistics of emotions, communicative linguistics, psycholinguistics,
paremiology.
The above mentioned
phenomenon has been investigated by M. Alefirenko, Yu. Apresyan,
N. Arutjunova, O. Volf, T. Kosmeda, V. Mokiyenko,
T. Osipova, Yu. Pradid, O. Selivanova, J. Sternin.
V. Teliya, V. Shahovskyi, I. Shkitska and others. In Ukrainian
linguistic researches the manipulative tactics of positiveness, semantic and
pragmatic peculiarities of complementary expressions have been investigated by
I. Shkitska [Шкіцька 2012]. The relevance
of research is determinated by the analysis of speech formulas that
verbalize the negative emotions. Emotionality is a linguistic category that
expresses certain emotional states of a person by means of the language units
[Шаховский 2008, 2010].
The purpose of the research is to describe
speech formulas of verbalization of the negative emotions, feelings and states,
directed to neutralization of the negative influence in a communicative space
of the Ukrainian linguistic culture, taking into account a speech expression of
the Ukrainian consciousness, the expression of the Ukrainian national
character. The purpose raises the following tasks: 1) to compile the sample of cursings; 2) to single out the
speech formulas that verbalizes the negative emotions; 3) to determine the
following speech genres: cursing, paroemia; 4) to analyze the speech
formulas that are used during quarrels, fights, threats.
The novelty of the research is determined
by the analysis of speech formulas that verbalize the negative emotions in
Ukrainian linguistic culture. The novelty is also defined with the analysis of
a speech genre cursing.
The theoretical value of the study is
reasoned with the disclosure of speech formulas that verbalize the negative
emotions and states.
The theoretical
results give reasons for practical
importance, which may be used in linguistics of emotions, psycholinguistics
as well as in pragmaliguistics.
Each language
paroemia fund contains the information about the peculiarity of a communicative
and emotional competence of this or that linguistic culture, its ability to
model the speech behaviour formulas, to verbalize the behaviour tactics, in
particular the reaction to express the negative emotions, feelings and states.
Concerning the Ukrainian linguistic culture this information is distinctly
traced in "Галицько-руські народні приповідки"
("Halytsko-Rus'kyh Narodnyh Prypovidkah"), compiled by
I. Franko.
In the
consciousness of the Ukrainians from Halychyna certain stereotypes have been
worked out. These stereotypes illustrate a certain verbal reaction on a
definite situation, its estimation, as well as the estimation of a person’s
behaviour in this situation, approval and disapproval. These speech stereotypes
are called “speech formulas” by I. Franko (see the works of
T. Kosmeda [Космеда 2010]). These formulas verbalize mainly negative
emotions, feelings of anger, fear, irritation, unsatisfaction, hatred and the
others, that are represented in quarrels, threats, cursings and the others.
These facts were partially mentioned in the works of the author of the article
[Сліпецька 2011; Сліпецька 2013].
The cursings
illustrate some emotionality of the Ukrainians. The emphasis is mainly laid on
the emotions of a person, his or her sensual sphere, compare: до серця му помовив – the contrary by
I. Franko: промовив this word
addresses to feelings [Франко 2006: 115].
Ivan Franko fixed
the examples of offensive addresses that were used by different social classes,
for instance, "a stupid
recruit" translated as "рекрутське
вухо" [Франко 2006: 15]. The nation has certain formulas to answer
different offences, rebukes, threats that concern a definite situation or an
abstract one, compare: Не роби так, бо
гріх. – Е, гріх у міх, а спасеніє в
торбу, а хто буде на перешкоді, того в морду – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: it's a sin to do it
[Франко 2006: 30], making fun of: Я ріс
та все в ніс – the commentary is made by I. Franko: usually a man snaps back when he is made fun
of because of his big nose [Франко 2006: 60]; не все сі то робить, що сі говорить – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: a person answers when
being threatened [Франко 2006: 30].
Sometimes this kind
of answers have a joking character, compare: Пан Біг не дитина, би слухав дурного Клима – the commentary is made
by I. Franko: answering cursing and
threats [Франко 2006: 133].
Cursings may be of
a soft character not evil and kind as well. The trait of a national Ukrainian
character of being devout: the belief that only God has a right to judge: бодай ті Пан Біг, але я ти не зичу – the
commentary is made by I. Franko, for instance: a joking cursing when a man
curses being angry, "recollection
that it is a sin to curse" [Франко 2006: 177]. The falk wisdom
reflects the knowledge of Psychology, certain recommendations are given to
prohibit "evil words", compare: Не
рікши му ліпше – the commentary:
"the word "рікши" is
used when saying something evil about a person" [Франко 2006: 15].
The following
euphemistic cursings have a joking character: Підеш до Пана Бога на скаргу – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: when somebody seeks the
reason for a quarrel and the other person says to step back otherwise he or she
would be beaten and even the God will not help [Франко 2006: 34]; Бодай тобі горнець розстрілило! – the
commentary: the cursing a joking character [Франко 2006: 52]. Evidently, the
cursing is modelled by a female language personality because the image peculiar
to a woman is represented in this cursing. Sometimes the cursing is projected
to an unexpected effect, contrary to a negative one, compare: Піб'є тебе Пан Біг квасним молоком – the
commentary is made by I. Franko: "a
big disaster" [Франко 2006: 134], "disaster" sauer milk is
meant, that was a favourite drink of peasants. So, a certain
"conditional" cursing is meant, in fact – that is a wish to enjoy the
meal / food.
But there are also
euphemistic cursings that wish diseases and death, compare: А розперло би тобі бік! – the commentary: cursing
[Франко 2006: 51]; А робив би грудьми!
– the commentary: cursing: “to work hard” [Франко 2006: 28]. The
cursings concern even children. That is may be caused by the situations of an
upbringing process, when children are disobedient, are mischief makers. Adults
get irritated and use cursings and the process of neutralization of the
negative emotions takes place, for instance: Бодай єс не ріс більший! – the commentary: the cursing concerns a young
boy [Франко 2006: 59].
Some cursings are
based on the Slavic believes: Бодай єс
руку з гробу виставив! – the commentary is made by I. Franko: the cursing, motivated by a falk belief that
a criminal who is not punished shows his hand from the coffin/grave, asking for
punishment [Франко 2006: 63], so the above mentioned cursing concerns the
legal sphere: judgement and punishment are meant.
The expression of
threat in the language consciousness of the Ukrainians is represented with
certain language formulas. The most widely spread threats are the following: a
physical punishment, killing, for example: Як
ті пірву в свої руки, то з тебе гною нароблю! – the commentary: the rivals [Франко 2006: 71]; Не минеш ти моїх рук! – the commentary: the man’s threat addressed to another man [Франко
2006: 67]; Як ті вхоплю в руки, то з тебе
кишки випущу – the commentary is made by I. Franko: the rival’s threat of a physical punishment
[Франко 2006: 71]; Як ті пірву в свої руки, то з тебе гною нароблю – the commentary: the threat of a physical punishment [Франко 2006: 71]; Стережи сі моїх рук, бо не життя твоє – the commentary: the threat of killing
[Франко
2006: 69].
The so called
"soft" threats may be singled out. These threats concern children,
for instance: Буде прут у роботі – the commentary: the threat of being
physically punished (concerns children), compare: Свари – не розуміє, бий нема
що – the commentary: concerns an
imbicile, disobedient child [Франко 2006: 80]; the
threats-vulgarisms: Буде с-ка в роботі! –
the commentary: the threat of being physically
punished [Франко 2006: 38]; threats-euphemisms: Будеш у роботі! – the commentary: the threat concerns a physical punishment [Франко 2006: 38]; Не минеш ти моїх рук! – the
commentary: the threat of being
physically punished [Франко 2006: 67].
The speech genre "a quarrel" has a peculiar paroemiological
verbalization. The quarrel is verbalized as reasonless, needless, in vain, a
falk consciousness disapproves this action, calls for peace, compare: Посварилисмося та й сі перепросимо – the
commentary
of I. Franko: the quarrel caused with silly trifles that
aren’t worth fighting [Франко 2006: 80]; Нема що робити, треба ся
сварити – the commentary is made by I. Franko: the quarrel caused with silly trifles [Франко 2006: 80]; Сварімося, діду, за чужу біду
– the commentary
is made by I. Franko: said about the quarrel that has
no reasonable grounds [Франко 2006: 80]; the situation that acquires
admonition, warming not interference is singled out (a national trait of
character of the Ukrainians – individualism is verbalized), compare: Не сварися дідку за чужу бідку – the commentary is made
by I. Franko: don’t start quarreling if it does not concern you [Франко
2006: 80]. A precedent situation is verbalized that is
modelled, based on anecdote the ending of which served the basis of paroemia
that criticizes a groundless quarrel, perhaps, the quarrel that helps to get
rid of a stress: Сварімся, бабуню! – Та за що, синочку? Та сварімся, стара тупице! А ти собачий сину, чого хочеш? –
Дякую, бабуню, вже посварилисьмося – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: the anecdote is about a groundless quarrel [Франко 2006: 80]. In Ukrainian Halitsian linguistic culture "a quarrel" may be
emotionally expressed. It may cause an affectation state, for instance: Сваримося стіни тріщать – the commentary of
I. Franko: about a
loud quarrel [Франко
2006: 80]; Таку сварку
почав, що був дим мало не сів на хату – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: about a
loud quarrel [Франко
2006: 81]. A falk wisdom states: Від сварки до бійки рукою
подати – the commentary from I. Franko: a quarrel causes fighting [Франко 2006: 81]; В сварці один другого не цілує,
чи малює – the commentary is made by I. Franko: in a quarrel nobody is spared [Франко 2006: 81]; Не вдаваймося в сварку, бо будеш
битий – the commentary: "an
admonition is said to a man who is fond of fighting" [Франко 2006: 81].
In paroemia fund the concept-image of a person who is fond of fighting is
verbalized, a person is warned, for instance: А сварив бис сі з сорочков – the commentary of I. Franko: "is said about a person who is fond of making quarrels". Sometimes
I. Franko explains the semantic structure of a cursing, gives its
semantic-pragmatic motivation, for instance: сорочка найближча до тіла [Франко 2006: 80]. People who are fond of fighting
are usually made fun of: Дай Боже вам
посваритись, а нам подивитись [Франко 2006: 81]; Уперед сварили сі, а тепер
цілують сі – the commentary is made by I. Franko: a behaviour characteristics is verbalized
that implies the change of a mood
[Франко 2006: 80]; Я сі з тобов не годен висварити – the commentary: is said about a man who is fond of fighting
[Франко
2006: 80].
There examples of cursings among neighbors who are fond of fighting: Я найму кого, аби сі з тобов на шихти сварив – the commentary is made by
I. Franko: is said about a neighbor,
a person had a fight with. The explanation given to the word “шихтa” / “шихта в Бориславі” – a twelve-hour work
[Франко
2006: 80]. The situation that concerns a quarrel between people
who are familiar: Розійшлися як чорна
хмара – the commentary: is said about
ex-lovers, close friends [Франко 2006: 50].
Conclusions. Each linguistic culture and language consciousness create the code of
speech behavior that represents people’s inclination to express negative emotions
(dissatisfaction, irritation, anger, hatred, fear) affectation states or a
negative mood. The above mentioned state is verbalized with speech formulas of
a quarrel, cursing or threats. In paroemia fund of the Ukrainians there are
many units are aimed at criticizing negative activities, verbalization of some
irony, indirect expression of admonition, warning, recommendations, emphasis on
traditions, religious bans, moral imperatives. The form of an indirect
communication, euphemism-phrases is used as well as vulgarisms peculiar to
modeling of a negative communication. As it can be seen people’s consciousness
reflects the knowledge of psychology, laws and rules of a successful
communication. All these aspects are described, formulated and characterized in
the sphere of the modern humanities. Perspective is determined by the necessity to single out the
peculiarities of modeling of paroemia formulas that concern the specificity of
verbalization of the negative emotions and states in Ukrainian, Russian and
English linguistic cultures.
References.
Космеда 2010: Космеда,
Т.А. Комунікативний кодекс українців у пареміях [Текст] /
Т. А. Космеда. – Дрогобич : Коло, 2010. – 272 с.
Космеда 2010: Космеда,
Т.А. Комунікативна компетенція Івана Франка та особливості його риторики
[Текст] / Т. А. Космеда // Іван Франко : дух, наука, думка, воля
матеріали Міжнародного наукового конгресу, присвяченого 150-річчю від дня
народження Івана Франка. – Львів : Видавничий центр Львівського національного
університету імені Івана Франка, 2010. – Т. 2. – С. 73-85.
Сліпецька 2011: Сліпецька, В.Д. Прокляття як засіб
репрезентації негативної комунікації [Текст] / В. Д. Сліпецька //
Збірник наукових праць Харківського національного педагогічного університету
імені Г. С. Сковороди. – Харків, 2011. – Вип. 32. – С. 236-241.
Сліпецька 2013: Сліпецька, В.Д. Вияв негативних емоцій
в українській, російській і англійській лінгвокультурах : мовленнєвий жанр
прокляття [Текст] / В. Д. Сліпецька // Studia Ukrainica Posnaniensia.
– Познань : Видавничий центр Познаньського університету імені Адама Міцкевича,
2013. – С. 195-200.
Шаховский 2008: Шаховский, В.И. Лингвистическая теория
эмоций [Текст] / В. И. Шаховский. – М. : Гнозис, 2008. – 416 с. –
Библиограф. : с. 389-407. – ISBN 978-5-94244-019-0.
Шаховский 2010: Шаховский, В.И. Эмоции :
долингвистика, лингвистика, лингвокультурология [Текст] /
В. И. Шаховский. – М. : Книжный дом ЛИБРОКОМ, 2010. – 128 с. –
Библиограф. : с. 118-124. – ISBN 978-5-397-00850-1.
Шкіцька 2012: Шкіцька, І.Ю.
Маніпулятивні тактики позитиву : лінгвістичний аспект [Текст] / І. Ю. Шкіцька. – К. : Видавничий дім
Дмитра Бураго, 2012. – 440 с. – Бібліограф. : с. 392-435. – ISBN 978- 966-489-138-4.
Sources and Abbreviations
Галицько-руські 2006:
Галицько-руські народні приповідки : [у
3 тт.] / [зібрав, упорядкував і пояснив Др. Іван Франко]. – Львів : ВЦ ЛНУ ім. І. Франка, 2006.
– 2-е вид. – Т. 1. – 818 с. – Т. 2. – 813 с. – Т. 3. – 699 с.
Наукова студія присвячена аналізу законів комунікативного простору,
репрезентованого у вигляді проклять, де зафіксовані мовленнєві формули, моделі
комунікативних поведінкових тактик, які зреалізовуються представниками
відповідної лінгвокультури в ситуації актуалізації негативних емоцій, станів,
почуттів для омовлення погрози, сварки та їх оцінки з урахуванням специфіки
національного характеру відповідної лінгвоспільноти.
Ключові
слова: лінгвокультура, прокляття, комунікативний простір, мовленнєві формули,
погроза, сварка, негативні емоції, національний характер.
Available 10 September 2013.
|
