PRO-subject of the German Participle Clauses in the Syntactic Role of Adjunct

© The Editorial Council and Editorial Board of Linguistic Studies

Linguistic Studies
Volume 40(1), 2020, pp. 
50-64

PRO-subject of the German Participle Clauses in the Syntactic Role of Adjunct

Borovska Olena

Article first published online: December 01, 2020 


Additional information

 Author Information: 

Borovska Olena, Assistant of Department of German Philology at Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University, PhD Student of Kyiv National Linguistic University, 10.02.04 – Germanic Languages. Correspondence: olenabor2016@gmail.com

Citation: 
Borovska, O. PRO-subject of the German Participle Clauses in the Syntactic Role of Adjunct [Text] // Linhvistychni Studiyi / Linguistic Studies : collection of scientific papers / Vasyl' Stus 
Donetsk National University; Ed. by Anatoliy Zahnitko. Vinnytsia : Vasyl' Stus DonNU, 2020. Vol. 40(1). Pp. 50-64. ISBN 966-7277-88-7

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2020.40.1.4

Publication History:

Volume first published online: December 01, 2020
Article received: July 01, 2020, accepted: August 01, 2020 and first published online: December 01, 2020

Annotation.

У статті досліджено референцію нульового PRO-суб’єкта в німецьких партиципних клаузах. Проаналізовано ознаки наявності PRO-суб’єкта в партиципних клаузах у синтаксич¬ній ролі ад’юнкта; визначено умови вибору антецедента для PRO-суб’єкта; розглянуто ме¬ханізми контролю PRO (обов’язкового та необов’язкового контролю PRO). Наявність нульо¬вого PRO-суб’єкта в партиципних клаузах є необхідною вимогою Теорії зв’язування та тета-критерію. Для визначення механізмів контролю PRO-суб’єкта залучено методику І. Ландау, що передбачає перевірку на дотримання ознак обов’язкового та необов’язкового контролю.

Keywords: clause, participle clause, adjunct, null categories, PRO-subject, PRO control, obliga¬tory control, non-obligatory control.



Abstract.

PRO-SUBJECT OF THE GERMAN PARTICIPLE CLAUSES IN THE SYNTACTIC ROLE OF ADJUNCT

Olena Borovska

Department of German Philology, Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical Uni­versity, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

Abstract

Background: The sentence belongs to the central concepts of syntax and is its basic unit, around which other types of syntactic categories are grouped. Researcher focus their attention mainly on syntactic categories that have a material expression. However, most natural languages turn out to have a number of elements that are phonologically empty (latent, eliminated, or overt) in certain syntactic environment.

In generative linguistics, non-finite verb forms are considered to have a clause status. The verbal character of these forms is explained by their ability to form their own clause similar to the finite verb. The predicate center of such clauses is a non-finite form of the verb; the subject is always empty, that is, phonologically unexpressed. In this respect, the study of syntactic and functional features of the overt PRO-subject of а nonfinite clause is an especially significant issue within the generative grammar.

Purpose: The purpose of the research is to outline the functional nature of the PRO-subject in German participle clauses.

Results: In the analyzed material the obligatory control of the PRO-subject in participle clauses is performed by the subject of the matrix sentence. PRO-subjects in clauses with passive matrix sentences, with participles II of transitive verbs and with an implicit argument in the matrix sentence as an antecedent for PRO are as well obligatory controlled.

Some participle clauses show evidence of non-obligatory controlled PRO-subjects: the antecedent for PRO can be interpreted as generic or the antecedent for PRO can correspond to the whole matrix sentence. Verification of all non-obligatory control criteria is problematic for such participle clauses, as it is not always possible to assign the property [+human] to the antecedent for PRO. This issue needs further study.

Discussion: A phonologically unexpressed PRO-subject is a quite strict limitation for participle clauses in the role of adjunct. The author explains the presence of an overt subject in participle clauses in the terms of the Theory of Binding and Theta Criterion. The PRO-subject in participle clauses has no phonological form, but is syntactically active. The prospects of the research are in the further study of the inner structure of German participle clauses.

Keywords: clause, participle clause, adjunct, null categories, PRO-subject, PRO control, obliga­tory control, non-obligatory control.

Vitae

Olena Borovska is Assistant of Department of German Philology at Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University, PhD Student of Kyiv National Linguistic University, 10.02.04 – Germanic Languages. Her areas of research interests include generative linguistics, func­tional linguistics and text linguistics.

Correspondence: olenabor2016@gmail.com


Article.

References. 

References

1.      Huyvanyuk, Nina. Formal'no-semantychni spivvidnoshennya v systemi syntaksychnykh odynyts' (Formal-Semantic Relations in the System of Syntactic Units). Chernivtsi: Ruta, 1999. Print.

2.      Yartseva, Viktoriya, ed. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' (Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary). Moskva: Sovetskaya entsyklopediya, 1990. Print.

3.      Podobryaev, Aleksandr. “Podlezhaschee pri nominalizatsiyah v russkom yazyike (Subject at Nominalizations in the Russian Language)”. Issledovaniya po glagol'noy derivatsii (Research on Verbal Derivation) (2008): 231 – 249. Print.

4.      Testelets Yakov. Vvedenie v obschiy sintaksis (Introduction to General Syntax). Moskva: Izdatelstvo RGGU, 2001. Print.

5.      Tsimmerling, Anton. “Nulevyie leksemyi v sintaksise: dogmatika i tipologiya (Null Lexemes in Syntax: Dogmatics and Typology)”/ Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskih issledovaniy 2 (2008): 226 – 244. Print.

6.      Tsymmerling, Anton. “Sintaksicheskie nuli v grammatike (Syntactic Nulls in Grammar)”. Ezhegodnaya Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya “Dialog 2009” (Annual International Conference “Dialogue 2009”). Moskva: Izdatelstvo RGGU, 2009. 519 – 529. Print.

7.      Axel, Katrin and Helmut Weiss. “Pro-drop in the history of German – From Old High German to the modern dialects.” Null Pronouns. Ed. by M. Wratil, P. Gallmann. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. 21 – 52. Print.

8.      Bailyn, John. “Configurational Case Assignement in Russian Syntax”. The Linguistic Review 12 (1995): 315 – 316. Print.

9.      Brandt, Patrick, Beata Trawiński, and Angelika Wöllstein. “(Anti-)Control in German: Evidence from Comparative, Corpus- and Psycholinguistic Studies”. Co- and Cubordination in German and Other Languages 21 (2016): 77 – 98. Print.

10.  Brodahl, Kristin Klubbo. Zu deutschen Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 1 als Kern. Trondheim: NTNU, 2016. Print.

11.  Chomsky, Noam. Lectures on Government and Binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1981. Print.

12.  Fuß, Eric. “Historical pathways to null subjects: Implications for the theory of pro-drop”. Null Pronouns. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. 52 – 98. Print.

13.  Hornstein, Norbert. “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1999): 69 – 96. Print.

14.  Kortmann, Berndt. Free Adjuncts und Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretattion. London/New York: Routledge, 1991. Print.

15.  Landau, Idan. Elements of Control. Dordrecht: Springer. 2000. Print.

16.  Landau, Idan. “The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments”. Linguistic Inquiry 41/3 (2010): 357 – 388. Print.

17.  Landau, Idan. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Print.

18.  Larson, Richard K. “Promise and the Theory of Control”. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1991): 103 – 139. Print.

19.  Legendre, Géraldine. “French Impersonal Constructions”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8 (1990): 81 – 128. Print.

20.  Ortmann, Albert. Anti-agreement with subjects and possessors from a typological perspective: A case for null pronouns or for economy? Null Pronouns. Ed. by M. Wratil, P. Gallmann. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. 223 – 264. Print.

21.  Philippi, Jule. Einführung in die generative Grammatik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008. Print.

22.  Salzmann, Martin. “Silent Resumptives in Zurich German Possessor Relativization”. Null Pronouns. Ed. by M. Wratil, P. Gallmann. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. 141 222. Print.

23.  Staudinger, Bernhard. Sätzchen: Small Clauses im Deutschen. Thübingen: Niemeyer, 1997. Print.

24.  Subjekt. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Wissenschaftliche Terminologie. Grammati­sches Informationssystem “grammis” Web. 25. May. 2020.

25.  Wratil, Melani. Uncovered Pro – On the Development and Identificaton of Null Subjects. Null Pronouns. Ed. by M. Wratil, P. Gallmann. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. 99 – 140. Print.

 

List of Sources

1.      Linguistik online: Eine Open-Access-Zeitschrift für Linguistik. Web. 15. März 2020.

2.      Vertacnik, Hans-Peter. Abfangjäger: Ein Fall für Peter Zoff. München: Dotbooks, 2013. Print.

3.      Zeitschrift für Rezensionen: Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft. Web. 12.Apr. 2020.