© The Editorial Council and Editorial Board of Linguistic Studies
Linguistic Studies
Volume 40(2), 2020, pp. 157-165
Organization of Subject-to-Subject Interaction while Studying a Foreign Language in the Conditions of Distance Learning
Kolos Yuliia, Кupar Maiia
Article first published online: December 01, 2020
Additional information
|
Author Information:
Kolos Yuliia, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of General Linguistics and Foreign Languages at National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Correspondence: yulia.kolos@gmail.com Кupar Maiia, Lecturer of Department of General Linguistics and Foreign Languages at National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Correspondence: maiia.kupar@gmail.com
Citation: Kolos, Yu., Кupar, M. Organization of Subject-to-Subject Interaction while Studying a Foreign Language in the Conditions of Distance Learning [Text] // Linhvistychni Studiyi / Linguistic Studies : collection of scientific papers / Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University; Ed. by Anatoliy Zahnitko. Vinnytsia : Vasyl' Stus DonNU, 2020. Vol. 40(2). Pp. 157-165. ISBN 966-7277-88-7
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2020.40.2.18
Publication History:
Volume first published online: December 01, 2020
Article received: July 01, 2020, accepted: August 01, 2020 and first published online: December 01, 2020
|
Annotation.Описано основні переваги та труднощі дистанційного навчання, зокрема під час ви-вчення іноземних мов. Розглянуто види взаємодії за дистанційної форми організації навчання. Проаналізовано поняття суб’єкт-суб’єктної взаємодії, описано методи й передумови її ор-ганізації під час вивчення іноземної мови у навчальному процесі вищого навчального закладу. Наведено приклади анкет для рефлексії викладача й студента. Keywords: subject-subject interaction, distance learning, communicative approach, active learning.
Abstract.
ORGANIZATION OF SUBJECT-SUBJECT INTERACTION DURING FOREIGN LANGUAGE
TEACHING IN THE CONTEXT OF DISTANCE LEARNING Yuliia Kolos Department of General
Linguistics and Foreign Languages, National University “Yuri Kondratyuk
Poltava Polytechnic”, Poltava, Ukraine. Maya Kupar Department of General
Linguistics and Foreign Languages, National University “Yuri Kondratyuk
Poltava Polytechnic”, Poltava, Ukraine. Abstract Background: During
the COVID-19 associated quarantine period, distance learning became the only
form of education which
is carried out by means of information and communication technologies. Although
distance learning has many undoubted advantages, there are a lot of
difficulties for both teacher and student as well. The main problems are lack
of motivation, absence of direct communication especially during foreign
language teaching where it is vital, computer-associated problems etc. Purpose: to
determine the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning, the role of subject-subject
interaction in the process of distance learning of foreign languages and the
factors contributing to it, to analyze tools for assessing interaction and
types of educational work in terms of their applicability. Results:
Distance learning is a promising form of educational process organization,
which, in our opinion, will occupy an increasingly strong position in the
market of educational services. However, to achieve successful results,
distance courses developers and instructors should look for effective
combinations of techniques and forms, make full use of the potential of
information and communication technologies, focus on all 4 types of
interaction. They also ought to pay special attention to subject-subject
interaction in the mode of teacher-student and student-student relations,
provide timely feedback, and utilize interactive learning methods. Discussion:
We see prospects for further research in the development of methods of distance
foreign languages teaching with a comprehensive and systematic use of
interactive techniques by means of information and communication technologies. Keywords:
subject-subject interaction, distance learning, communicative approach, active
learning. Vitae. Yuliia Kolos is a Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate
Professor, Associate Professor of Department of General Linguistics and Foreign
Languages at National University “Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Her
areas of research interest include formation of future translators’
professional competence, use of computer technologies in foreign language
teaching. Correspondence: yulia.kolos@gmail.com Vitae. Maya Kupar is a Lecturer
of Department of General Linguistics and Foreign Languages at National University “Yuri
Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic”. Her areas of research interests include theory
and practice of foreign language teaching, use of computer technologies in education.
Correspondence: maiia.kupar@gmail.com
Article.
References.
1.
Bouhnik
Dan, Marcus Tali. Interaction in
distance-learning courses. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006. 57(3). P. 299–305. Print. 2.
Han S. Y., Hill S. R. Collaborate to learn, learn to
collaborate: Examining the roles of context, community, and cognition in
asynchronous discussion. Journal of
Educational Computing Research, 2007. 36(1). P. 89–123. Print. 3. Haythornthwaite C. Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures
in a computer-supported distance learning class. Information Society, 2001. 17(3). P. 211–226. Print. 4.
IU –
Teaching Online. Thinking About Learning Activities. Web. 08 Oct. 2020. 5.
Johnson S. D., Aragon S. R.,
Shaik N. & Palma-Rivas N. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning
outcomes in online and face-to-face learning
environments.
Journal of Interactive Learning Research,
2000. 11(1), 29–49. Print. 6.
Kovalev G. A. Tri paradigmy v
psihologii – tri strategii psihologicheskogo vozdejstvija. (Tree paradigms in Psychology – three strategies of psychological influence). Obshhenie i dialog v praktike obuchenija, vospitanija i psihologicheskoj
konsul’tacii (Communication and dialog in practice of teaching, mentoring and psychological
consulting). Mosсow, 1987. 4–16. Print. 7.
Moore M. G. Three types of interaction. The
American Journal of Distance Education, 1989. 3(2). P. 1–6. Print. 8.
Rendyuk S. P. Sub’yekt-sub’yektna
dydaktychna vzayemodiya vykladacha i studentiv u navchal’no-vykhovnomu protsesi
tekhnichnykh universytetiv (Subject-subject didactical interaction of teacher and student in technical universitys’ education). Imidzh suchasnoho pedahoha (Modern pedagogue’s image), 2016. (5).
32–34. Print. 9. Thurmond V. A., Wambach K. Understanding
Interactions in Distance Education: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Instructional
Technology and Distance Education, 2004. 1(1). Web. 08 Oct.
2020. 10.
Vonderwell S., & Zachariah S.
Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 2005. 38(2). P. 213–230. Print.
11. Zolotukhin S. A. Tipy vzaimodejstvija s
obuchajushhimisja v komp’juterno-oposredovannom obuchenii. (Forms of students
interactionin computer-mediated education). Sovremennye
issledovanija social’nyh problem (Modern Research of Social Problems).
2013. 5(25). Web. 08 Oct. 2020.
|
|
|